A witness account of last Saturday’s attack – the 3rd in as many months in Britain – heard one of the attackers proclaim, ‘This is for Allah’, before alighting a vehicle to begin a killing spree that left 8 dead and approximately 48 injured. At the time of writing this article, authorities are trying to gather intelligence and evidence following the attack, which also extended to Borough Market, a few minutes from London Bridge on the south side of the Thames.
I am a south Londoner, so this atrocity is close to home. However, while saying this, it must also be stated that every attack in Britain since 7/7 has been on home soil. Many British Muslims, who unashamedly possess a sense of pride and belonging, will share the sentiment of Britain being home. Extremists – whether religious, far right or otherwise – neither like nor want this. They would rather we have no sense of belonging or affinity to our place of birth, upbringing and citizenship. Religious extremists prefer that we experience the type of fear and insecurity witnessed among the thousands of refugees fleeing war torn countries or inhabitants being killed in those societies. Their rather simplistic and regressive strategy may succeed for a short, momentary phase during and shortly after terrorist attacks. However, these feelings have always been replaced by stoicism and a resolve to return as quickly as possible to normality. Similar behaviour is also often witnessed in the plight of suffering refugees and inhabitants from the above-mentioned societies, (although periodic domestic terror attacks cannot equate to mass displacement.)
Britain is still recovering from the outrageous attacks of Westminster and Manchester. The latter attack was even more reprehensible for the targeting, killing and wounding of innocent children with the youngest casualty aged only 8 years old.
This was also an attack on religious values
Last Saturday night’s equally atrocious attack assumed a slightly different degree of malevolence due to its timing. Muslims around the world are currently observing the holy month of Ramadan, fasting during long daylight hours and standing for extra devotional prayers at night. In Britain, Ramadan has become a unique experience for both Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Londoners gather for social and culinary events following the final prayers of the evening. Beforehand, they would have completed the day’s fast with a small amount of food in order to adequately prepare for the ensuing night prayers. Both Muslims and non-Muslims will have been frequenting restaurants that night, enjoying the ambience of their environment. What about the three attackers? Did they complete their fasts; enjoy the solidarity and camaraderie of colleagues when sharing a meal? Did they participate in the final evening prayers? If so, they clearly misunderstood the essence of what this month symbolises for 1.6 billion Muslims.
As security and intelligence agencies attempt to piece together events leading up to this attack, it is unlikely we will ever know precisely what compelled these individuals to embark on a campaign of terror. However, what we do know is that their acts have no justifiable basis in Islam – whatsoever.
Fusilier Lee Rigby’s murder: A precursor for the type of attacks today?
Previous terrorist attacks are fast disappearing into the annals of the not too distant history as we attempt to keep abreast of the most recent ones. This is disturbing because previous concerns and warnings, regarding the changing nature of attacks, have been ignored. The nature of Lee Rigby’s murder in 2013 alarmed us due to its barbarism and resultant calm repose of his killers following their very public attack. We need not cast our glances to Syria to witness ‘Jihadi John’ wielding a knife over a kneeling hooded captive; the aftermath of the Westminster attacks provided sufficient graphic detail, illustrating the level of depravity intended by these acts. The body of a dead woman under a bus, another floating in the Thames, the streets covered in blood among injured and strewn bodies are scenes reminiscent of apocalyptic movies, not modern 21st century cities.
Conclusion: Reclaiming the religion, starting with terminology
As Muslims, we will continue to address and reject extremists and their terroristic resolve to wreak havoc due to their hatred for our collective way of life. Their resentment also extends to fellow Muslims who they purport to represent, (one only has to recount their disregard for Muslim lives and the subsequent death toll at their hands in the Middle East, North Africa and elsewhere to see that they do not). Their misrepresentation of Islam will also continue to be challenged and rejected. However, it must be made unequivocally clear that their use of the same terminology or language does not automatically equate them to the majority of Muslims’ experiences and beliefs, or us to theirs.
Make no mistake; the recent incident, like other heinous attacks, are not for Allah. Instead, they are as a result of misplaced hatred and in contradiction to an important Quranic injunction, adhered to by the majority of Muslims globally:
‘O you who believe! Stand out firmly for Allah as just witnesses and let not the enmity and hatred of others lead you to injustice. Be just: that is nearer to piety…’ 
 Laville, S, Topping, A & Carrell, S: ‘Second Manchester bomb victim named as eight-year old Saffie Ross Roussos,’ The Guardian, 24th May 2017: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/23/parents-in-desperate-search-for-missing-children-after-manchester-attack
 Baker, A H: ‘Young British Muslim converts need support to prevent another Woolwich’, The Guardian, 31st May 2013: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/31/young-muslim-converts-support-prevent-woolwich
 Atkins, N & Lines, A: ‘Woolwich attack video: Watch shocking footage of terrorists charging at police car in attempt to kill WPC,’ The Mirror, 24th May 2013: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woolwich-attack-video-watch-shocking-1907772?service=responsive
 English rendition of The Quran, Chapter 5, verse 6.